Louise McIntosh Slaughter
D–NY-25 · U.S. House · since 1987
- Trades
- 17
- 17 filings
- Last filed
- 2018-03-06
- newest filing
- Purchases minus sales over the trailing 12 months, summed from the statutory ranges on each filing — an interval, not an estimate of value.
- —
- purchases − sales
- Rows filed past the STOCK Act's 45-day window, out of the 17 rows whose dates allow a late status.
- 1 of 17
- filed after 45 days
House Clerk + Senate eFD · amounts are Amounts are statutory ranges; totals on this page are therefore ranges too. Amount ranges ↗ · as of 2026-10-23
Quarterly flow
8 quarters · by trade dateNo disclosed purchases or sales were traded in the chart window, 25Q1–26Q4 (2025-01-01 through 2026-10-23, the build date). Most recent disclosed trade: 2018-02-13 — the full history is in the tables below.
purchases above the axis, sales below · solid = the provable minimum, lighter = up to the maximum; a maximum past the axis top is cut and marked · gaps are gaps — no interpolation · y from $0 · no midpoints — bar spans the disclosed bounds · source: House Clerk + Senate eFD
Trades
17 trades · newest filed first| Side | Ticker | The asset as filed, without the parts that repeat the row: a trailing “(TICKER)” that is the row's ticker, the stock code “[ST]” when it is the row's type (“Stocks (including ADRs)” in the House Clerk's list of asset type codes), and a trailing “Common Stock” or “Ordinary Shares”. Any other code is shown as its words from that list; a code not on it keeps its brackets. A name that differs from the filing in any other way is a button: its note gives the text as filed. The filing itself is the exact record. Filings under this member include transactions by spouse (SP), dependent children (DC), and joint accounts (JT) — the STOCK Act does not distinguish who directed a trade. Owner codes ↗ | Range | Traded → filed | Src |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +21d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +24d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +27d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +23d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +20d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +20d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +23d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +22d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed LATE·457d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +22d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +22d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +28d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +22d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +19d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +29d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +25d | |
| BUY | PG | As filed: Procter & gamble Company (Pg) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +16d |
Each row is the latest version of its filing: an amendment replaces the original it supersedes, and the original stays in the published record. ↗
1–17 of 17 transactions
Filing history
| Filed | Rows | Receipt |
|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-06 | 1 | |
| 2017-12-07 | 1 | |
| 2017-09-06 | 1 | |
| 2017-06-02 | 1 | |
| 2017-03-02 | 1 | |
| 2016-12-05 | 1 | |
| 2016-09-02 | 1 | |
| 2016-06-02 | 1 | |
| 2016-05-13 | 1 | |
| 2016-03-03 | 1 | |
| 2015-12-03 | 1 | |
| 2015-09-09 | 1 |
1–12 of 17 filings
Recent disclosures and committee context
Largest recent disclosures
last 90 days · by lower boundNone in the last 90 days.
Committees · jurisdiction overlap
membership snapshot 2026-10-23 · jurisdiction mapping v1No committee memberships on record in the snapshot.
No trades in this member's committee jurisdictions · 17 trades predate the membership snapshot's validity window: unanswerable, not cleared.
A jurisdiction overlap is context, not an accusation: it establishes and implies no legal, ethical, or causal conflict. It states only that the issuer's sector falls within a committee this member sat on as of the trade date, per the sources and mapping versions shown.