Roy Blunt
R–MO · U.S. Senate · since 1997
- Trades
- 11
- 9 filings · 2 paper
- Last filed
- 2022-11-08
- newest filing
- Purchases minus sales over the trailing 12 months, summed from the statutory ranges on each filing — an interval, not an estimate of value.
- —
- purchases − sales
- Rows filed past the STOCK Act's 45-day window, out of the 11 rows whose dates allow a late status.
- 6 of 11
- filed after 45 days
House Clerk + Senate eFD · amounts are Amounts are statutory ranges; totals on this page are therefore ranges too. Amount ranges ↗ · as of 2026-10-29
Senate filings through 2026-10-22 (the last successful Senate check, 2026-10-23); the Senate site has not allowed automated access since then.
Quarterly flow
8 quarters · by trade dateNo disclosed purchases or sales were traded in the chart window, 25Q1–26Q4 (2025-01-01 through 2026-10-29, the build date). Most recent disclosed trade: 2022-06-06 — the full history is in the tables below.
purchases above the axis, sales below · solid = the provable minimum, lighter = up to the maximum; a maximum past the axis top is cut and marked · gaps are gaps — no interpolation · y from $0 · no midpoints — bar spans the disclosed bounds · source: House Clerk + Senate eFD
Trades
11 trades · newest filed first| Side | Ticker | The asset as filed, without the parts that repeat the row: a trailing “(TICKER)” that is the row's ticker, the stock code “[ST]” when it is the row's type (“Stocks (including ADRs)” in the House Clerk's list of asset type codes), and a trailing “Common Stock” or “Ordinary Shares”. Any other code is shown as its words from that list; a code not on it keeps its brackets. A name that differs from the filing in any other way is a button: its note gives the text as filed. The filing itself is the exact record. Filings under this member include transactions by spouse (SP), dependent children (DC), and joint accounts (JT) — the STOCK Act does not distinguish who directed a trade. Owner codes ↗ | Range | Traded → filed | Src |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SELL | — | PMI·partial · SP (partial sale, spouse-owned) | $15K–$50Kamendment pendingno ticker | Traded → Filed LATE·349d | |
| SELL | — | KH·SP (spouse-owned) | $15K–$50Kno ticker | Traded → Filed +6d | |
| BUY | AMBP | Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.·SP (spouse-owned) | $50K–$100K | Traded → Filed +6d | |
| SELL | KHC | The Kraft Heinz Company·SP (spouse-owned) | $15K–$50K | Traded → Filed LATE·57d | |
| BUY | NRDY | Nerdy Inc. Class A·SP (spouse-owned) | $1K–$15K | Traded → Filed +1d | |
| SELL | MDLZ | Mondelez International, Inc.·partial · SP (partial sale, spouse-owned) | $50K–$100Kamendment pending | Traded → Filed LATE·253d | |
| SELL | KHC | The Kraft Heinz Company·partial · SP (partial sale, spouse-owned) | $1K–$15Kamendment pending | Traded → Filed LATE·259d | |
| SELL | — | MDLZ (stock option)·SP (spouse-owned) | $50K–$100Kamendment pendingno ticker | Traded → Filed +35d | |
| SELL | — | CSCO·SP (spouse-owned) | $1K–$15Kamendment pendingno ticker | Traded → Filed LATE·54d | |
| SELL | — | PM·SP (spouse-owned) | $1K–$15Kamendment pendingno ticker | Traded → Filed LATE·61d | |
| SELL | MDLZ | Mondelez International, Inc. (NASDAQ)·SP (spouse-owned) | $50K–$100K | Traded → Filed +24d |
Each row is the latest version of its filing: an amendment replaces the original it supersedes, and the original stays in the published record. ↗
1–11 of 11 transactions
Filing history
| Filed | Rows | Receipt |
|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-08 | 1 | |
| 2022-06-12 | 2 | |
| 2022-04-16 | 1 | |
| 2021-09-28 | 1 | |
| 2020-08-11 | 2 | |
| 2016-02-03 | 3 | |
| 2014-12-05 | 1 |
Paper filings — not machine-readable
Counted in totals, but not machine-readable until OCR. Each links to the original.
Recent disclosures and committee context
Largest recent disclosures
last 90 days · by lower boundNone in the last 90 days.
Committees · jurisdiction overlap
membership snapshot 2026-10-29 · jurisdiction mapping v1No committee memberships on record in the snapshot.
No trades in this member's committee jurisdictions · 6 trades predate the membership snapshot's validity window: unanswerable, not cleared.
A jurisdiction overlap is context, not an accusation: it establishes and implies no legal, ethical, or causal conflict. It states only that the issuer's sector falls within a committee this member sat on as of the trade date, per the sources and mapping versions shown.